Know your state's status before registering. Laws change — always check each casino's current T&Cs.
These 6 states have enacted laws or taken regulatory positions that prevent most sweepstakes casinos from operating there.
Michigan's Lawful Internet Gaming Act (LIGA, 2019) created a licensed online gaming framework that sweepstakes operators fall outside of. The Michigan Gaming Control Board has taken the position that sweepstakes casinos offering SC redemption constitute unauthorized gambling. Multiple major operators voluntarily withdrew from MI to avoid enforcement risk.
Washington State defines gambling broadly under RCW 9.46 to include any activity where "something of value is wagered on an outcome." The Washington State Gambling Commission has historically treated sweepstakes casinos with skepticism, and several operators have received formal cease-and-desist orders. WA remains one of the most restrictive states for any gambling-adjacent entertainment.
Nevada's Nevada Gaming Control Board requires licensing for any entity offering "gambling" to Nevada residents — and their broad definition captures sweepstakes casinos. The irony is notable: Nevada's strict gambling regulations that protect its casino industry effectively prevent sweepstakes casinos from operating there. Licensing costs and requirements make it economically unviable for sweepstakes operators to pursue NV licenses.
New York has some of the strictest anti-gambling laws in the US. The NY Attorney General's office has targeted social casino operators, and most sweepstakes casinos preemptively restrict NY players to avoid enforcement risk. NY is also actively pursuing a licensed online casino market, which may eventually create a legal pathway for sweepstakes operators.
Montana operates a highly regulated gambling environment with state lottery and tribal gaming as the primary legal formats. The Montana Gambling Control Division's broad enforcement authority and the legislature's historical hostility to gambling expansion has led all major sweepstakes operators to restrict MT players.
Idaho's constitution explicitly prohibits most forms of gambling, with Idaho Code § 18-3801 defining "gambling" broadly. Idaho courts and law enforcement have historically taken expansive views of what constitutes illegal gambling. Sweepstakes casinos restrict ID players as a precautionary measure given the legal environment.
These states have uncertain or evolving legal status. Some casinos accept players from these states, others do not.
California's legal situation is complex. Most sweepstakes casinos accept CA players — Crown Coins, McLuck, LoneStar, MegaBonanza, and Hello Millions all operate in CA. However, Stake.us restricts CA due to its 21+ age requirement combined with specific CA regulations. Always verify with your chosen casino before registering.
Connecticut passed sweepstakes-adjacent legislation in 2023 that created regulatory uncertainty. Most major casinos restrict CT players, but Crown Coins Casino and a few others accept CT players with modified terms. Check each casino individually — the situation can change without notice.
Indiana's existing gaming statutes (Indiana Code 35-45-5) create enough legal uncertainty that most sweepstakes operators restrict IN players as a precautionary compliance decision. Some platforms may allow free GC play but block SC redemptions. The situation varies by operator — always check each platform's current Terms of Service under "Eligible States" before registering.
| State | Crown Coins | McLuck | Stake.us | MegaBonanza | LoneStar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida (FL) | |||||
| Texas (TX) | |||||
| California (CA) | |||||
| Connecticut (CT) | |||||
| Indiana (IN) | |||||
| Michigan (MI) | |||||
| Washington (WA) | |||||
| Nevada (NV) | |||||
| New York (NY) |
= Available · = Restricted · = Transitional / Check T&Cs
Compare all options available in your state — ranked by bonus, payouts, and trust.
See All Rankings →




